Requirement Oversight · Risk Early Warning · GDPR Compliance · End-to-End Transparency

Third-Party Technical Supervision is designed for enterprises "worried about requirement deviations, unreasonable tech solutions in outsourced projects, or lacking in-house expertise to control quality", covering custom development, system integration, and data migration. Unlike vendor self-inspection, we provide end-to-end supervision from a neutral third-party perspective: project initiation → development → testing & launch → maintenance handover. We verify tech solution compliance (GDPR, ISO 27001), monitor requirement delivery (avoiding feature gaps), and warn of tech risks (architecture flaws, performance bottlenecks), delivering 12+ supervision reports. Solving pain points like "unmet requirements, delays, and poor quality", it boosts project success rate to over 95%.

1. Project Initiation: Solution & Compliance Review

• Tech Solution Evaluation: Assemble a cross-disciplinary team (architects, industry consultants) to review the vendor’s tech solution (dev framework selection, system architecture) for feasibility (e.g., "Is microservices suitable for business scale?"), delivering Tech Solution Review Report;
• Requirement Baseline Confirmation: Organize PRDs between client and vendor to define requirement boundaries and acceptance criteria (e.g., "e-commerce platform supports 100k concurrency"), creating Requirement Baseline Document to avoid ambiguity;
• Compliance Pre-Check: Verify if the tech solution meets industry regulations (GDPR for data, HIPAA for healthcare) (e.g., "Is data encryption GDPR-aligned?"), delivering Compliance Pre-Assessment Report.

2. Development Phase: Progress & Quality Control

• Progress Oversight: Check progress against milestones (e.g., "requirement analysis completion, core module dev") and identify deviations (e.g., "3+ day delays need correction plans"), issuing weekly Project Progress Supervision Report;
• Tech Quality Control: Spot-check deliverables (code standards, API doc completeness) and verify core functions against requirements (e.g., "Does user login support SMS verification?"), conducting monthly tech reviews to deliver Quality Check Report;
• Risk Early Warning: Identify potential risks (e.g., "insufficient architecture scalability, unstable 3rd-party API integration") and provide solutions (e.g., "adjust architecture layers, switch to stable APIs"), delivering Risk Warning & Response Report.

3. Launch & Handover: Acceptance & Delivery Assurance

• Testing Supervision: Oversee the vendor’s testing process (test case coverage, bug fix rate), spot-check key scenarios (e.g., "e-commerce payment flow integrity"), and verify test result authenticity, delivering Testing Supervision Report;
• Launch Acceptance: Assist the client in final acceptance, verifying requirement delivery (100% core requirements met), performance metrics (e.g., "100k concurrency achieved"), and compliance (e.g., ISO 27001 certification), delivering Final Acceptance Supervision Report;
• Maintenance Handover Oversight: Verify completeness of vendor deliverables (source code, maintenance manuals, API docs) and supervise knowledge transfer (e.g., "client team masters fault troubleshooting"), delivering Handover Acceptance Report.

4. Target Scenarios

• 1. Custom Development Projects: E.g., "Enterprise outsourcing CRM development" — the supervision team reviews the tech solution (e.g., "compatibility with existing ERP") and monitors requirement delivery (e.g., "customer profiling function compliance") to avoid mismatches;
• 2. System Integration Projects: E.g., "Manufacturer implementing MES-ERP integration" — the team evaluates integration feasibility (e.g., "data sync frequency meets production needs") and warns of API compatibility risks to ensure stable operation;
• 3. Cloud Migration Projects: E.g., "Enterprise migrating on-prem data to AWS" — the team verifies GDPR compliance (data transfer rules) and monitors data integrity (zero loss/corruption) to avoid business disruption;
• 4. Large-Scale Tech Upgrade Projects: E.g., "SaaS platform version upgrade" — the team controls progress (avoiding service downtime) and verifies performance (e.g., "latency meets global user needs") to ensure transparent management.